Now, Dr. Pry may not be as informed as some of you, but I think he did a pretty damn good job presenting facts and predictions.
I am aware of the belated Dr. Peter Vincent Pry, and the many boards, programs, books, and documentaries based on his assessments. The problem that I have is that his doctorates are in History and 2nd is in International Relations. It is kind of like that movie "The Fly" a guy using the "Black Box" method using other people's genius innovations to create his own work.
He is not a Nuclear Physicist, Biochemist, Mathematician, or a Structural Engineer, along with a few other course degrees to properly assess and formulate the report he gave to congress.
With his security clearances, I am sure that he is far more informed than someone like me, although I seriously doubt his IQ is anywhere close to mine, point being, he is not the guy that I would trust to "guess" how many people would survive his scenarios.
I had an uncle that worked on a classified gov project ( actually I have several uncles that have, but chose this one for this story). He couldn't tell us Jack
[email protected]#$ about what he was working on in Los Alamos, and his background was in adv mathematics & engineering, but what he could tell us about is his first day at the base with the head scientist working on the project.
The head scientist came in a couple of weeks prior to discuss what the team members job's entail, and about the project everyone was going to be working on. My uncle said that the scientist spoke for 4 hours that day, and it took my uncle the next two weeks to fully understand the project and his role in it, so in short 2 weeks to unravel what the hell that brilliant scientist's four hour lecture was about (ok those of us that know about Los Alamos knows this guy was a Physicist )
Dr Peter Pry was NOT that guy, and not even my uncle either...