Prepper Forum / Survivalist Forum banner
1 - 4 of 4 Posts

·
Super Moderator
1-6 months, natural disasters or economic collapse
Joined
·
10,111 Posts
Discussion Starter · #1 ·
If you've not seen the recent releases from Project Veritas, they claim to have new documents implicating a company called "EcoHealth" in the creation of what we now know as "SARS-CoV-2", the virus that causes COVID-19.

Forgive the length of this post. I tried to be thorough while accurately summarizing all points. The original email/report/proposal (found here) is much longer, but might be worth the read.
Project Veritas has their own article linking to the individual documents here: Military Documents About Gain of Function Contradict Fauci Testimony Under Oath

One of the most damning pieces of information is an email from one Major Joe Murphy, USMC, a member of the Office of Naval Research and DARPA fellow.
In this email, the Major lays out numerous points. I'll do my best to summarize them.
1. The SARS-CoV-2 "virus" is an American-created bat coronavirus vaccine, or a precursor to creating one. It was absolutely created by the EcoHealth Alliance at the Wuhan Institute of Virology in Wuhan, China under the name "Project DEFUSE: Defusing the threat of bat-borne coronaviruses". The proposal laid out every phase, step by step and in great detail, down to the roles of the scientists involved, by Peter Daszak. As a DARPA fellow, The Major has visibility to the proposals for this work, U.S. intelligence collected concerning the lab, and information from congressional office investigations, all corroborating the same information. The lab was doing this work until it was shut down in April of 2020.
The purpose of the program was to inoculate the local bat population in Yunnan, China, and prevent eventual future coronavirus mutations and spread to humans. The idea was originally intended to prevent future Sever Acute Respiratory Syndrome(SARS) pandemics, like we saw with MERS and SARS-Cov-1. This population of bats had already been confirmed to have a natural SARS coronavirus, and it could potentially spread to humans someday. The verbatim language used to described the program's intent was "inoculate bats with novel chimeric polyvalent spike proteins to enhance their adaptive immune memory against specific high-risk viruses".
Originally the proposal was sent to the DOD, but was rejected by DARPA because they believed it violated the "gain of function" moratorium. So the proposal was sent to the NIH/NIAID, and was accepted, with Dr. Anthony Fauci at the head of the NIH at the time.

2. The Major then describes the virus with a renaming to what he considers more accurate for a human-manipulated creation, using the new name "SARS-CoV-WIV" (Wuhan Institute of Virology). He states that the virus is a "synthetic spike protein chimera engineered to attach to the human ACE2 receptors and inserted into a recombinant bat SARSr-CoV backbone." He claims it is likely a live "vaccine", but one that was not yet attenuated to a sufficient state to be used in the wild for the bats.
The vaccine was intentionally designed to be an aerosol because bats cannot contract respiratory illnesses from droplets, and inoculating the population via injection was ridiculously impractical. The plan was to flood the caves the bats were known to reside in with this aerosol, inoculating the whole population at once.
Prior to being ready for its intended purpose, the "vaccine" leaked from the lab, and due to its intentional design of being an aerosolized deployment, it spread rapidly.
One DAMNING claim is the Major's assertion that the proposal itself, which originated this entire endeavor, actually notes that interferon, Remdesivir, and chloroquine phosphate (hydroxy) all inhibit SARSr-CoV viral replication.
(Page 4 of proposal: "Universal bat interferon. Interferon has been used clinically in people, e.g. against filoviruses, and replication of SARSr-CoV is sensitive to interferon")
(I was not able to confirm any mention of Remdesivir or chloroquine in my searching of the EcoHealth Alliance proposal, and the Major does not reference where this can be found. - Kauboy)
The Major then claims that enough is now known about the nature of the illness that we can readily provide early treatment that inhibits viral replication.
He lists Ivermectin as having been shown to be a "curative" as early as April 2020 through all phases of the illness. He states that Hydroxychloroquine was known to be a curative in the same month(he states this is mentioned in the original proposal, but I could not find it). And interferon noted as a known curative as of May 2020.

He explains that the mRNA vaccines work poorly because they only replicate the synthetically enhanced spike protein, and they do not create/posses any other "epitopes" (which are antigens all illnesses create, of varying types, that he immune system creates antibodies for). The spike proteins are generated by the vaccine recipient's cells, dumped into the bloodstream, and begin to interact with the ACE2 receptors of the host's cells. This is why many people develop symptoms similar to contracting SARS-CoV-WIV.
The Major notes that the EcoHealth proposal states that a "vaccine approach lacks sufficient epitope coverage to protects against quasi-species of coronavirus." The Major points out that this may be why vaccinated individuals can still contract other variants. Having only been vaccinated with the original shot, they are not protected against anything but the original spike protein.

The Major believes that the mass vaccination program has actually acted as a real world "gain of function" program for the virus. By challenging the virus during the heat of the pandemic, with a single form of protection, evolutionary mutations would eventually yield a variant that can avoid that protection entirely. This was actually a phase in the DEFUSE project, but was originally intended to be done on "humanized mice", subjecting them to spike protein vaccines, allowing antibodies to form against the spike, and then re-infecting repeatedly to force an evolution of the virus, thereby making it more effective when eventually turned into a vaccine for the bats. As the Major puts it, "Instead, it was done with the world's population."

Because the original intention of the bat vaccine was to immunize, the Major concludes this is likely why most people don't die from COVID, but those who do are generally older or have multiple comorbidities. He also notes that the asymptomatic nature of a large percentage of the population is evidence of the bat-vaccine working as intended, by creating immunity from the disease without harming the host. ("a good vaccine does not generate symptoms" the Major notes)

3. The Major expresses his view on changing the narrative of beating this virus. He believes that we now understand the virus, and we better understand our physiological response to it. With this information, we must transition away from thinking we are "limiting disease transmission" as he does not think this is the real problem or feasible, and instead move to early treatment protocols and prophylaxis with the now known curatives mentioned earlier.

4. Point #4 is basically the Major providing his bona fides. He explains where he found the information, how he corroborated it, and how he put it all together.
He also notes the "massive, 'Manhattan Porject'-level of information suppression executed by the government and the Trusted News Initiative indicates that it would be covered-up if something bad happened."
He stated that once he found the files on the DARPA network, he pushed them off-site and complied his report. He claims these are all unclassified.

His report was dated August 13th, 2021.
There is no date on the email that the report was attached to, but the report was sent up his chain of command at some point.
All of this has been known by high profile people in the USMC since August of last year.
 

·
Super Moderator
1-6 months, natural disasters or economic collapse
Joined
·
10,111 Posts
Discussion Starter · #2 ·
It has occurred to me that the post above, despite being summarized, is still likely far too long for most folks to leisurely read.

Here's an even smaller "TLDR" summary.
1. The COVID-19 virus WAS, without any doubt, created in the Wuhan lab by request from EcoHealth Alliance and approved for funding by Anthony Fauci's NIH/NIAID. It was originally intended to be a legitamate bat vaccine to stop the mutation/spread of SARS illness in the local bat population and prevent future possible spread to humans. It leaked from the lab before it was ready for the bat population.
2. The COVID vaccines only target the spike protein epitope, and are useless against the rest of the virus or variants of it. Ivermectin, Hydroxychloroquine, and Remdesivir were apparently know to be curatives in 2020.
3. We must move away from limiting disease transmission, because this is likely impossible, and instead move to early treatment via the above mentioned curatives.
4. Support for the Major's claims and claims of information suppression.

This should really be getting more public attention than it has. I've not seen a single news agency talk about it, even the "right wing" alternatives.
 

·
Super Moderator
1-6 months, natural disasters or economic collapse
Joined
·
10,111 Posts
Discussion Starter · #4 ·
How do we know if it's legit? 🤔
Generally Project Veritas corroborates their info before releasing it. Not sure how they would have done this for this situation. Finding the proposal documents would likely be pretty difficult on their own. They rely on insiders to procure and release this kind of info that isn't publicly available.
Then it's also a matter of whether one trusts the messenger. Is this Major in the USMC, and former DARPA fellow, reputable and reliable? That's up to each reader to decide.
Based on the documents included with the email, it looks like he's provided "receipts", as those would be pretty difficult to fabricate, and easily refuted if inaccurate.
 
1 - 4 of 4 Posts
Top