Joined
·
640 Posts
On the My Tents thread... WVprepper said something that tickled an itch has been nagging at me for a long time. Sure... I plan and prepare for my family, like all of you do. But doing things on your own can be tough. Ideally... you'd want to hook up with some other preppers you trust and maximize the skills your group has. But... the question becomes "What is the ideal group size?" Yes... I know it depends on the event... location, season, climate, etc.
But... how do you plan for or "react" and form a group without it becoming a detriment to all?
Ideally... you want a mix of skills so the workload is spread. You want others to bring a mix of gear... to increase your chances of survival and make things more comfortable and normal (whatever that means). And... more bodies means more protection. But... it also means more supplies consumed; a greater chance of dissent; higher risk of being discovered; more work to find shelter for all; etc.
Anyone have any thoughts on the value of small vs large groups? And... how would you define "small" and "large"?
But... how do you plan for or "react" and form a group without it becoming a detriment to all?
Ideally... you want a mix of skills so the workload is spread. You want others to bring a mix of gear... to increase your chances of survival and make things more comfortable and normal (whatever that means). And... more bodies means more protection. But... it also means more supplies consumed; a greater chance of dissent; higher risk of being discovered; more work to find shelter for all; etc.
Anyone have any thoughts on the value of small vs large groups? And... how would you define "small" and "large"?