Prepper Forum / Survivalist Forum banner
1 - 12 of 12 Posts

·
Super Moderator
1-6 months, natural disasters or economic collapse
Joined
·
10,092 Posts
The shots do not, and CAN NOT, alter your nucleic DNA. Period.
This has to do with the vast differences in the DNA of individuals. You and I may be human, but our sequences are so drastically different that any function that would seek to affect the nucleic DNA between us would be such a broad hit that it would become extremely obvious amongst the population.
We certainly have the technology to alter nucleic DNA. Google "CRISPR-Cas9" if you want to learn more. It's pretty fascinating. But it is a targeted approach that requires the participants DNA to be analyzed and uniquely altered.
There is no way to do this on a large scale.

The part people get screwed up on is that these shots DO inject mRNA into a cell. This is exactly like how a virus functions. The mRNA (messenger RNA) sits within the cytoplasm of the cell, and ribosomes come along, read the single strand molecule, and build a specific protein. In a normal cell, this is how the cell produces the proteins necessary to function. In a cell infected with a virus, or with one of these mRNA shots, a new mRNA molecule is introduced. The ribosomes come along, read the new molecule, and produce the protein that the virus or shot is seeking.
In the case of these mRNA shots, the molecule instructs the cell to produce the "spike protein" that surrounds the SARS-Cov2 virus.
The expectation is that the body would identify these proteins as foreign, trigger an immune response, and then be prepped for future infections where these spike proteins are found.
This will lead to all manner of complications in the future, as we don't want to stop all instances of these proteins, and we don't fully understand what is happening to these artificially built proteins as they float around the body. Inflammation has been the leading negative result, and depending on where the inflammation is happening, the body's reaction can range from mild to severe.

To reiterate...
These shots DO NOT alter your nucleic, double-stranded, deoxyribonucleic acid molecules.
We have to STOP propagating pseudo-science proposed by pseudo-intellectuals. The reality of all of this is bad enough.
We don't need additional static from junk "science" interfering with real facts.
 

·
Super Moderator
1-6 months, natural disasters or economic collapse
Joined
·
10,092 Posts
because of the graphene oxide
This is getting ridiculous.
There is no graphene or graphene oxide in the shots. What source would you trust and accept to disclose this fact?

Here's Dr. James Tour, a professor of synthetic chemistry, and Messianic Jew, with his take on some of these conspiracy theories:

We have got to pump the brakes on the hysteria and nonsense.
We should be focusing on the fact that NOBODY should be forced to take anything they don't want.
Bringing up new nonsense to squabble about only detracts from this point, the root point of it all, a person's liberty.
 

·
Super Moderator
1-6 months, natural disasters or economic collapse
Joined
·
10,092 Posts
No...
This speculation arose from two places.
One, an interview with a former employee of Pfizer. We know people can be fully trusted when they leave a company and violate NDAs, right?
Two, from a pair of Spanish scientists who claimed to have found graphene oxide in a liquid solution they claimed was the Pfizer shot. No evidence has been produced to prove the liquid tested was actually the Pfizer shot "Comirnaty". The evidence has not been peer reviewed at this time either.

 

·
Super Moderator
1-6 months, natural disasters or economic collapse
Joined
·
10,092 Posts
Quantity of studies is irrelevant when quality is lacking.
Peer reviewed studies have been checked and rechecked by other groups.
Show me peer reviewed research. Please.

And yes, other vaccines do indeed have toxins. I'm not debating that. For far too long we have accepted the word of people who want to put things into us without much question.
I'm only specifically addressing these Covid shots. I refuse to call them vaccines, because they don't prevent illness.
 

·
Super Moderator
1-6 months, natural disasters or economic collapse
Joined
·
10,092 Posts
Uh huh, peer reviewed by a bunch of lying, godless, baby killing liberals pushing their globalist depopulation agenda!

Hey, believe what you want and enjoy bowing down to the darkness of blind mankind.... which is getting darker with each passing day. Period!

I get it, you're way too old to understand that this ain't yo daddy's medical science of yesteryear where they did their best to do right by the people.
They call it being naive

Eventually you'll get it that those days have passed us now. Period!
You tend to believe everything you read on the internet.
It's pretty clear who's the naive one here...
I guess you're too young to have the wisdom to smell the BS.
Naivete can be forgiven, but your willful ignorance can't.

You take care now, and in case no one ever told you, don't follow strangers with candy, and don't play in the street.;)
 

·
Super Moderator
1-6 months, natural disasters or economic collapse
Joined
·
10,092 Posts
You know it is very rare to have a vaccine with 100% effectiveness. COVID shot on original strain of COVID had a 95% effectiveness rate. Considered very effective. Four years ago the flu shot had a 30% effectiveness ratio. Some Viruses mutate as a method to adapt and survive into different environments. The flu mutates annually and sometimes biannually. So they perpetually come up with new vaccines for the flu . This variant of COVID is a mutation but the vaccine still carries a high( but not as high) effectiveness rate. In a case study 99% of the patients in icu beds from delta were unvaccinated . Why the delta variant is causing an explosion of cases among the unvaccinated. PBS is pretty thoroughly peer reviewed just to back up my claim. Not trying to sway your own decision. Just putting another point of view to anyone reading that it may offer another point of view in their decision.
I appreciate the input, but you may have missed the context.
There's been a claim that the shots contain graphene oxide, and I requested peer reviewed studies to show to proof.
None was provided.

This hasn't been a question about the efficacy of the shots. The numbers show that lots of people have benefited from getting it, at least where the alpha strain is concerned.
 

·
Super Moderator
1-6 months, natural disasters or economic collapse
Joined
·
10,092 Posts
Someone is getting just a bit judgey, aren't they?
You have no idea what the people of this board know. You're just happy to exist in your own blissful world where you, and only you, know everything.
Enjoy that lonely hill.
 

·
Super Moderator
1-6 months, natural disasters or economic collapse
Joined
·
10,092 Posts
Kind of a phony demand when everybody knows Spain and others have analysed the contents and there is no such thing as a peer reviewed study to provide you and its a trick to demand one ('cause how dumb straight people are, so fun)

I hope you shoot the crap up with all the democrats and hurry if you like? I wouldn't cater to the tricky fake demand, just hand ya a syringe and thanks of a grateful nation?
Maybe you should just demand the military give you all the skinny on the weapon during the operation? Because we are after all in a military operation that started at detrick? The military ran to an overturned vax truck in level suits. With that? I really need no more than all the liars to have 3 doses?
Nothing phony about proving a claim with repeatable results. That's the whole point of a peer reviewed study. Make a claim, present your methods, show your result, and ask others whether they can repeat your results or not.
Nobody with any credibility would rely on one lab's findings to make a declaration of fact. It must be repeated and proven again.
"Follow the science" used to actually mean something.
 

·
Super Moderator
1-6 months, natural disasters or economic collapse
Joined
·
10,092 Posts
You go right ahead? You follow and here is some science that we knew they would sicken and die before it even started? For your peer review, no mammals survived it, so fauci stopped testing. For your science.

Here is you just one of thousands of doctors idiots ignore for the govt weirdos

Because if they will hysterically believe and shoot up what lgbtqpJ made? Its a darwin for the rest of the population?
I support your choices!
Maybe you're a little late to the game, or maybe you've got a screw loose, but I've never supported anything close to a position that these shots are good or safe.
I asked for a peer reviewed study to support outlandish claims about foreign contaminants and dangerous chemicals being present in them.
As your links rightly point out, there's plenty wrong with the shots on their own without the need for making wild and unsupported claims on top.
It has been my goal to keep us focused on reality, not speculation and unsupported claims.
When it's something this bad, reality is scary enough.

Why do you put question marks at the end of sentences that are not questions?
Why do you take tangents away from the points being made?
Why did you start posting with such fervor 3 years after you joined and were largely silent?
Not trying to discredit. Just curious...
We have others on here with a tendency to wander. Maybe that's just how your mind works too.
 

·
Super Moderator
1-6 months, natural disasters or economic collapse
Joined
·
10,092 Posts
I don't come here mostly because of you?
I'm honored, but since that too ended with a question mark, maybe you're not so sure.
 

·
Super Moderator
1-6 months, natural disasters or economic collapse
Joined
·
10,092 Posts
My wife was sent this video yesterday, and I strongly encourage others to spread it.
A medical doctor speaking before a Michigan House committee giving her perspective on these shots:
 

·
Super Moderator
1-6 months, natural disasters or economic collapse
Joined
·
10,092 Posts
So Project Veritas is a conspiracy theory site? The hidden camera isn't really hidden and these are all actors?

What agency are you with?
I don't think he was referring to you, but he didn't quote anyone, so who knows.
 
1 - 12 of 12 Posts
Top