Does anyone have real proof of their existence? I have never seen any "evidence" that could be taken as fact. Just curious. I'm defiantly not a believer, are you?
That is a brilliant piece of logic there! I can reuse that in many aspects of my life. For example, Hillary Clinton. I have never seen Hillary Clinton. I have seen pictures that claim to be Hillary Clinton, but how do I know that is not just a Bigfoot dressed in a polyester pant suit? I think I will go with the notion that Hillary Clinton doesn't actually exist and anybody that claims otherwise is obviously working with a demented imagination.I've never seen one, but I've never seen China either. People say they have been to China, I've seen pictures that claim to be of China, and there are maps of China, but I have to take it on faith that China actually exists. For all I know, China is fake and bigfoot is real. <shrug>
I saw the news story on that racoon thing. After years in a couple different zoo's, pretty much the only reason they figured out what they had was they were trying to breed it and it (she) wouldn't let any of the other animals hump her.I have read a sampling of literature on Bigfoot and cryptid man apes and there does appear to be a fair amount of evidence, although most of it is anecdotal. One book that deals with Sasquatch in a scientific way is written by Jeff Meldrum, a professor of anatomy at the University of Idaho. It is quite a thorough study and uses scientific analysis to examine the issue. Sasquatch: Legend Meets Science: Jeff Meldrum, George B. Schaller: 9780765312174: Amazon.com: Books For those of you who say that Bigfoot could not exist because there is no way a species could live so close to man without being discovered consider this: New mammal species discovered: a raccoon-sized critter with teddy bear looks | Fox News.