One thing that has really been driving me nuts recently is the "if it doesn't cost a fortune, it must be crap argument." The fact of the matter is that while most of us are preparing for the worst, but in reality, none of us are ever going to be involved in a battle. Two questions are all that need to be answered for a piece of equipment that I am interested in adding. #1 - Does the product do what I want it to do, when I want it to do it? #2 - Does the product complete it's required/designed task safely? If the answer to both of these questions is in the affirmative, then I am a happy man. I don't need some gun elitist to tell me that since an optic did not cost twice as much as my AR, then it must be crap. That is ridiculous logic. That is the type of logic that drives our beloved Federal Government's annual budget woes. You go ahead and buy your EoTech. I have no doubt that it is far superior to what I am running, but just know that the difference in price for me went to practice rounds. I am glad that your optic can view me in HD clarity, but I have more rounds down range. Which is more important? Also, no offense to anyone, but I am so tired of the "in my experience, it will fail when you need it most" crap as well. Most of you have never had an equipment failure in a dire situation, but for those of you that have, honestly, how much had to do with user error? I would wager the vast majority of issues were due to users. Just sayin'. Now, I apologize, am vacating my soapbox, and am returning you to your regularly scheduled programming.