Scotus
Register

Welcome to the Prepper Forum / Survivalist Forum.

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed.

Scotus

This is a discussion on Scotus within the Political News and Topics forums, part of the General Discussion category; They did it again.. and Roberts specifically, ruled unconstitutional an LA (coonass.. not California) law not allowing those that practice in abortion clinics to have ...

Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 16
Like Tree31Likes

Thread: Scotus

  1. #1
    Super Moderator


    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    South of the Red River and North of the Rio Grande
    Posts
    2,675

    Scotus

    They did it again.. and Roberts specifically, ruled unconstitutional an LA (coonass.. not California) law not allowing those that practice in abortion clinics to have hospital practicing rights as well.

    They say it’s the exact law they ruled against in Texas.

    Ok... so here is my questions and concern.

    Where does it say in the constitution that the federal government can interfere with intrastate trade and regulation? Interstate..commerce.. sure but not ruling against a state law. Isn’t it a hospitals or states right to allow or disallow who can practice in what facility?

    Numerous numerous precedence being set.

    Me thinks we have gone WAY off the rails and are now going down the mountain.
    Slippy, Denton, A Watchman and 3 others like this.
    "Erosion of our rights just takes a few good men doing nothing"
    Who is John Galt?

  2. #2
    Senior Member


    Join Date
    Nov 2014
    Location
    Houston, TX
    Posts
    11,620
    Roberts is becoming a huge problem. Huge.
    Annie, Slippy and inceptor like this.
    " All great things are simple, and many can be expressed in single words: Freedom, Justice, Honor, Duty, Mercy, Hope" .Hidden Content

  3. #3
    Senior Member


    Join Date
    Oct 2016
    Location
    North Mississippi
    Posts
    2,848
    Quote Originally Posted by Piratesailor View Post

    Where does it say in the constitution that the federal government can interfere with intrastate trade and regulation? Interstate..commerce.. sure but not ruling against a state law. Isn’t it a hospitals or states right to allow or disallow who can practice in what facility?
    My understanding is that this has nothing to do with a hospital. The ruling just states the doctors in these facilities don't have to have admitting privileges in a local hospital. Hospitals can still grant those privileges to anyone they wish.

  4. Remove Advertisements
    PrepperForums.net
    Advertisements
     

  5. #4
    Senior Member


    Join Date
    Aug 2014
    Location
    PA
    Posts
    12,385
    They should be called scrotum not scotus. It fits better.
    Blessed be God, my rock who trains my hands for battle, my fingers for war. Psalms 144:1

    Victory can depend on a dog or a goose---Napoleon

  6. #5
    Super Moderator


    Join Date
    Dec 2015
    Location
    State of Grace, pls God.
    Posts
    6,180
    Does anyone have a link they can share? Thanks.
    "Confusion is the guardian of truth."--Vincent Frankini, Tumblar House

  7. #6
    Senior Member


    Join Date
    Jun 2016
    Posts
    5,557
    Quote Originally Posted by Annie View Post
    Does anyone have a link they can share? Thanks.
    https://www.foxnews.com/politics/sco...ortion-clinics
    Annie likes this.
    “Whoever would overthrow the liberty of a nation must begin by subduing the freeness of speech."

    Benjamin Franklin

  8. #7
    Senior Member


    Join Date
    Jun 2016
    Posts
    5,557
    The left either has something on him or his hatred for Trump is intense.

    Years ago when he cast a few surprise votes, it came out that the adoption of his children wasn't quite above board and maybe that was it.

    Personally, I believe it's something larger. But I do believe there is a skeleton somebody knows about and is hanging over his head.
    inceptor and patrioteer like this.
    “Whoever would overthrow the liberty of a nation must begin by subduing the freeness of speech."

    Benjamin Franklin

  9. #8
    Senior Member


    Join Date
    May 2018
    Location
    Great Plains
    Posts
    539
    I am fairly confident that RBG has a picture of him dressed up like a unicorn, stoned out of his mind, laying next to a dead prostitute.
    Slippy and esmok like this.

  10. #9
    Senior Member


    Join Date
    Sep 2014
    Location
    God's Country (aka Texas)
    Posts
    10,443
    The deeper issue goes back to Marbury vs Madison when the SCOTUS decided to usurp the authority of the other branches. That must be changed some way or another. What happened to the Convention of States Hub bub? That might could do it. Texas Secession could sure do it. Judicial dictatorships are not what the Founders envisioned.
    RedLion likes this.

  11. #10
    Senior Member


    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Location
    South Carolina
    Posts
    1,761
    This is why 2020 is so important. I think the court is already playing weekend at Bernie's with justice Ginsberg. There is no way her decomposing ass can last another four years. If Biden wins they will put a 40 year old ultra leftist on the court for the next 40 years.
    Slippy, RedLion and bigwheel like this.
    "In alcohol's defense, I've done some pretty dumb shit while completely sober too"!

 

 
Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast

Sponsored Links

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Back to Top