Which would you choose as a personal protection weapon? - Page 2
Register

Welcome to the Prepper Forum / Survivalist Forum.

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed.

Which would you choose as a personal protection weapon?

This is a discussion on Which would you choose as a personal protection weapon? within the Personal Protection, Gear, Mods, Accessories forums, part of the Weapons, Protection, Self Defense, Hand to Hand Combat category; Originally Posted by 1skrewsloose Is this country crazy or what, no baton, but glock ok? Not that I'm complaining, just pointing out an obvious flaw ...

Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 1 2 3 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 30
Like Tree35Likes

Thread: Which would you choose as a personal protection weapon?

  1. #11
    Senior Member


    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Location
    Sprawlburbia of North Texas
    Posts
    1,820
    Quote Originally Posted by 1skrewsloose View Post
    Is this country crazy or what, no baton, but glock ok? Not that I'm complaining, just pointing out an obvious flaw in the liberal reasoning. peace.
    Texas has some legal oddities. We have great gun laws but some of the most restrictive blade laws in the country. The only thing I can figure out is it's an attempt to keep idiots from bringing a knife to a gun fight.
    "You may all go to hell, and I will go to Texas". Davey Crockett

  2. #12
    Banned


    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    Right Behind You, No Really, Look
    Posts
    2,112
    Quote Originally Posted by The_Original_Prep View Post
    Hello all. I am in debate on which item, other than a knife, to which I may be able to protect myself in close hand-hand combat. Two options I am considering are a collapsible baton or a small handheld stun gun. Both have there ups and downs.

    The baton is light weight and doesn't need to be charged what so ever. Also, it might be able to be better concealed on persons due to its lower profile (in my opinion).

    Now, the stun gun is very effective when in really close quarters and can put the assailant down with one strike. It does have some limited factors though. First, it needs to have a charge. This may limit my options when carrying. For example: say I needed to bug out, and don't have it charged, or don't have any means to get it charged. What then? Second, it is a little bit bulkier than the Baton.

    With all that, I was just wondering what everyones preferences are? Which would you choose over the other and why? Do you have any other options for EDC protection?

    Thank you for any comments or constructive criticism. Will surely use anything I can squeeze out of you all.

    Original Prep
    A TASER maybe, a stun gun no. A stun gun requires you to get in extremely close (unless it's a 3' long Cattle Prod) and it does not incapacitate. It "stuns". My department issues the X26 TASER. I can use it with the cartridge which shoots the probes, or I can can pull the cartridge off and use it like a stun gun, which is nothing more than pain compliance. As soon as you lose or remove contact, it doesn't hurt anymore and the bad guy can carry on. With the cartridge, it's a 5 second ride, it hurts like hell and most people don't want anymore to do with it. But also realize it doesn't take long to recover; so run, get them restrained or zap them again.

    An expandable baton (ASP) is a good choice, but you definitely need training. I like impact weapons, so the old PR-24 (side handle baton) is an excellent choice, but not concealable, unless you get the expandable one. Chemical irritants are a good choice but get one that shoots foam or a solid stream, not a fog. The "fogger" is susceptible to wind and gets all over everything, including you. Used indoors, I've seen them get sucked into the ventilation system requiring the entire building to get evacuated. Which resulted in getting the guy fired. It was our building and he was goofing around with his spray, he sprayed himself and another guy, then we watched the cloud get sucked into a vent. Nothing like having nearly a dozen officers and a bunch of secretaries spending the next half hour coughing like they had emphysema.
    Meangreen likes this.

  3. #13
    Senior Member


    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Location
    Columbia, Tennessee
    Posts
    5,420
    I have used both many times in real world situations. The collapsible baton generally sucks. If you choose a stun gun that is the same as a Taser you are probably OK. As far as a defensive weapon that will buy time to escape I wouldn't rule out pepper spray.

  4. Remove Advertisements
    PrepperForums.net
    Advertisements
     

  5. #14
    Senior Member


    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Posts
    2,417
    Call me old fashioned but I really like my collapsible Steel Baton or as I call it, "my pipe!" Unless you're willing to spend a lot of money on a Taser, the little ones that get sold to the public are really junk. Where I work we screw around with the little hand held ones and think it's really funny to during muster to hit an unsuspecting person when they are sitting in a steel chair. Place the little electrodes on the leg of the chair, hit the power and watch the show! Steel batons always works and it's so easy even a caveman can do it!
    Prepadoodle likes this.

  6. #15
    Mod Squad


    Join Date
    May 2013
    Location
    Virginia
    Posts
    2,260
    I have to say a gun is the only real choice.

    I wouldn't want to take any of the other choices up against a knife, let alone against someone armed with a gun.

    I'm a fan of open carry, if it's legal where you are. Nobody is going to attack someone who is openly carrying a sidearm. All of the other choices mentioned, including concealed carry, let you react after the situation has already gone to hell. Only open carry prevents the problem in the first place.

    Since someone is bound to jump on me for this...

    Our local grocery store has an armed guard in plain view. I asked them about this and they said they got robbed 3 times in an 8 month period. So they hired the guard and in 14 months, haven't been robbed once. I have seen several different guards there at various times, and none of them would scare a robber if not for the gun on their sides. Thieves look for easy prey, it's as simple as that.

    Contrast this with how many shops get robbed when they have their weapons out of sight. Yeah, sometimes the element of surprise gives the clerk the upper hand once they pull out their gun, but it doesn't always end well for the clerks.

    Hidden weapons allow one to be reactive, open carry deters crime and is proactive. I would much rather prevent it in the first place.


    Success Is going from failure to failure without losing your enthusiasm - anonymous

  7. #16
    Senior Member


    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Location
    Now in AZ
    Posts
    8,806
    What Prepadoodle said.

  8. #17
    Senior Member


    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    Kentucky
    Posts
    1,595
    If the SHTF I am just going to carry a pistol, if a threat all of a sudden shows up I don't want to loose critical seconds thinking what should I grab my pistol, knife, taser, asp or prepper spray.
    Last edited by rickkyw1720pf; 11-13-2013 at 03:48 PM.

  9. #18
    Senior Member


    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Location
    Central East Southwest
    Posts
    1,791
    Quote Originally Posted by Prepadoodle View Post
    I have to say a gun is the only real choice.

    I wouldn't want to take any of the other choices up against a knife, let alone against someone armed with a gun.

    I'm a fan of open carry, if it's legal where you are. Nobody is going to attack someone who is openly carrying a sidearm. All of the other choices mentioned, including concealed carry, let you react after the situation has already gone to hell. Only open carry prevents the problem in the first place.

    Since someone is bound to jump on me for this...
    That someone isn't going to be me. I'm a huge advocate of open carry; it's a million times more comfortable, much easier to draw from and it's one hell of a good deterrent. There is a myth that it will somehow make you a target for bad guys. It's nothing more than a myth with absolutely no basis in reality.

    The only problem with open carry is that you do become a target for poorly trained police officers, and sadly some may think you're one of those bozos on youtube who go around provoking situations so they can regurgitate their knowledge of case files they read about on a forum somewhere.
    Prepadoodle likes this.
    Rest In Peace, Corporal Bradley Coy 06/08/92-10/24/14

  10. #19
    Senior Member


    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Location
    West WI
    Posts
    5,666
    Take two steps back draw gun and fire. Baton really?? Your tactics suck, no offense.
    PaulS likes this.

  11. #20
    Banned


    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    Right Behind You, No Really, Look
    Posts
    2,112
    Okay folks...gun was not one of his "options". Yes we would all prefer a gun, but he wanted to know of the two (baton or stun gun) which you would prefer.

 

 
Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 1 2 3 LastLast

Sponsored Links

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Similar Threads

  1. Personal Defense?
    By cantkilla in forum Hand to Hand Combat and Self Defense
    Replies: 55
    Last Post: 07-23-2020, 04:46 AM
  2. Please help me choose.
    By taps50 in forum General Prepper and Survival Talk
    Replies: 75
    Last Post: 10-10-2013, 09:54 PM
  3. Choose your caliber by the pound. BOB packing
    By BigCheeseStick in forum General Talk
    Replies: 13
    Last Post: 09-17-2013, 07:57 PM
  4. Choose your own crime stats ...
    By Gallo Pazzesco in forum General Talk
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 01-12-2013, 01:44 PM

Tags for this Thread

Back to Top