SCOTUS Case We have been waiting for? - Page 5
Register

Welcome to the Prepper Forum / Survivalist Forum.

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed.

SCOTUS Case We have been waiting for?

This is a discussion on SCOTUS Case We have been waiting for? within the HandGuns, Pistols and Revolvers, Long Rifles, Shotguns, SKS, AK, AR forums, part of the Weapons, Protection, Self Defense, Hand to Hand Combat category; Arguments start today. Dick Heller Predicts a Supreme Court Win for New York State Rifle & Pistol Association https://www.thetruthaboutguns.com/di...l-association/...

Page 5 of 5 FirstFirst ... 3 4 5
Results 41 to 48 of 48
Like Tree60Likes

Thread: SCOTUS Case We have been waiting for?

  1. #41
    Senior Member


    Join Date
    Sep 2015
    Location
    MN
    Posts
    11,272
    Arguments start today.

    Dick Heller Predicts a Supreme Court Win for New York State Rifle & Pistol Association
    https://www.thetruthaboutguns.com/di...l-association/
    Last edited by RedLion; 12-02-2019 at 09:32 AM.
    hawgrider and Sasquatch like this.

  2. #42
    Senior Member


    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    SE Wisconsin
    Posts
    18,130
    Wondering how this will end. NY tried to pull a fast one and make it mute. They knew they could just put it back like it was and again wait for another court to hear it after it works it's way through the system again. Looking like the court was not in on that plan.
    New life as a house husband, major shift in duties.

    Karl Marx said, "Destroy their culture, rewrite their history. Ruin their art and literature, and defame their heroes, by offering fabrications to scandalize that which they considered good.
    After reading this Obama said I am on it.

  3. #43
    Senior Member


    Join Date
    Sep 2015
    Location
    MN
    Posts
    11,272
    NBC trying to say that Roberts may side with the lefties and dismiss the case. This case needs to be heard to conclusion for these reasons....

    Paul Clement, who argued on behalf of three gun owners in New York and a state affiliate of the National Rifle Association, argued that the case was still active because the city had not been required to say the regulation was unconstitutional.
    and more importantly.....

    Since the court's landmark 2008 opinion in D.C. v. Heller, the lower courts have generally weighed the public interest in gun laws as part of their consideration of whether they are legal. Using that methodology, appeals courts have upheld a broad range of gun restrictions, and those laws have remained on the books as the Supreme Court refused to review them.

    Conservatives, including Kavanaugh while a federal appeals court judge, have argued that such considerations are unconstitutional, and that judges should instead look to whether the law was historically seen as permissible.
    https://www.cnbc.com/2019/12/02/supr...un-rights.html

  4. Remove Advertisements
    PrepperForums.net
    Advertisements
     

  5. #44
    Senior Member


    Join Date
    Sep 2015
    Location
    MN
    Posts
    11,272
    Quote Originally Posted by Smitty901 View Post
    Wondering how this will end. NY tried to pull a fast one and make it mute. They knew they could just put it back like it was and again wait for another court to hear it after it works it's way through the system again. Looking like the court was not in on that plan.
    It has been public information (including to the SCOTUS) for a few months the NY City got rid of the law as they knew it was UnConstitutional leading up to SCOTUS hearing it.
    Smitty901 and Slippy like this.

  6. #45
    Senior Member


    Join Date
    Sep 2015
    Location
    MN
    Posts
    11,272
    Gottlieb is optimistic about initial arguments.

    Alan Gottlieb: ‘Cautions optimism’ after SCOTUS hears arguments in New York gun case
    “We’re hopeful the High Court sees through New York’s attempt to moot this case by changing the law,” he continued. “The only reason that change was made is because the Court accepted the case for review earlier this year, and everybody knows it. That maneuver suggests the city knew all along its restriction would not pass constitutional muster, but only changed the law in an effort to prevent a court ruling that smacked it down.
    https://www.thegunwriter.com/24916/a...york-gun-case/

  7. #46
    Senior Member


    Join Date
    Sep 2015
    Location
    MN
    Posts
    11,272
    More on the first day of arguments and the notion that Roberts would side with the lefties....Likely a lie of course.

    The Key Takeaways From The Transcripts Of SCOTUS Gun Case
    https://bearingarms.com/cam-e/2019/1...otus-gun-case/

  8. #47
    Senior Member


    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    SE Wisconsin
    Posts
    18,130
    Quote Originally Posted by RedLion View Post
    It has been public information (including to the SCOTUS) for a few months the NY City got rid of the law as they knew it was UnConstitutional leading up to SCOTUS hearing it.
    Yep, and now if that ends up making the case in front of the court is ruled Moot . NY will come right back with another law and play the game through the courts again and again. No way to stop them unless the court keeps this case current and rules on it.
    New life as a house husband, major shift in duties.

    Karl Marx said, "Destroy their culture, rewrite their history. Ruin their art and literature, and defame their heroes, by offering fabrications to scandalize that which they considered good.
    After reading this Obama said I am on it.

  9. #48
    Senior Member


    Join Date
    Sep 2015
    Location
    MN
    Posts
    11,272
    Quote Originally Posted by Smitty901 View Post
    Yep, and now if that ends up making the case in front of the court is ruled Moot . NY will come right back with another law and play the game through the courts again and again. No way to stop them unless the court keeps this case current and rules on it.
    And you just gave one of the reasons why the case was selected to be heard as indicated in my posts right above yours.

 

 
Page 5 of 5 FirstFirst ... 3 4 5

Sponsored Links

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 0
    Last Post: 08-25-2018, 09:58 AM
  2. SCOTUS to hear case on involuntary union fees
    By RedLion in forum News & Links
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 09-29-2017, 09:07 AM
  3. Pistol You've Been Waiting 4. Get Em While They're Hawt.
    By Mosinator762x54r in forum HandGuns, Pistols and Revolvers, Long Rifles, Shotguns, SKS, AK, AR
    Replies: 24
    Last Post: 02-16-2016, 10:29 AM
  4. We've been beaten in the Arms Race by the Chinese! What are we gonna do
    By Real Old Man in forum UFO's, Zombies, 2012, Aliens, Mayan, End of the World, Apocalypse
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 02-07-2016, 02:15 PM
  5. so I keep waiting, waiting on the world to change
    By Jakthesoldier in forum General Talk
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 07-12-2015, 01:18 AM
Back to Top