Don't Lose Land to Taxes
Register

Welcome to the Prepper Forum / Survivalist Forum.

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed.

Don't Lose Land to Taxes

This is a discussion on Don't Lose Land to Taxes within the General Talk forums, part of the General Discussion category; Quite often in the survivalist, prepper, and libertarian nature of those movements I find people angry and bothered the government could take their land if ...

Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 16
Like Tree5Likes

Thread: Don't Lose Land to Taxes

  1. #1
    Senior Member


    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Posts
    4,373

    Don't Lose Land to Taxes

    Quite often in the survivalist, prepper, and libertarian nature of those movements I find people angry and bothered the government could take their land if the taxes are not paid. That is true. So how can you make sure the taxes are forever paid?

    It really isn't rocket science as much as its expensive. My property taxes in NV are about $1500 a year. I actually find that reasonable based on what I own. My dad left me most of this land, some is shared with my brother, and he and I have the same idea - make sure it stays in the family - forever and no matter what. We have property that, we can't imagine, be used by the government for anything so it won't be condemned or taken under the governments right to take property for public need. The only reason they'd be able to take it - or anyone would - is for lack of tax payment. So we've fixed that.

    We have established our wills and such to deposit our dollar values into a trust. We've made sure this trust will have about $300,000 in it. There is a formula to that. 2% of $75,000 will raise $1500 a year - the taxes. 2% of the other $225,000 will provide for permanent growth because we know government can raise taxes. But we went a step further with the trust; it identifies a party that will continue on and manage this money. They are authorized to sell hunting rights and a few other things on the property should they need to raise even more money - just incase $300k isn't enough. Is it absolute - no - but its pretty well assured that our taxes will be forever paid beyond us and the land can remain in the family and available to any and all family members for the best possible post SHTF life ever.

    Know your tax bill. Divide by .02% and figure out how to get that set aside so the tax bill is forever paid. Add a little for insurance - set - government can't take it - at least not without a fight.
    Nathan Jefferson likes this.

  2. #2
    Senior Member


    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    SE Wisconsin
    Posts
    21,019
    SHTF none of our preplanned finances will madder. You will keep or give up what is yours based other preps you have made.They do not need to use taxes to take your land by law they can just take it. Supreme Court already ruled on that one. What they pay is what they want they decide what fair value is.
    We lost 2 acres to high 16 that way. We were not even paid what the land was valued at for taxes.
    New life as a house husband, major shift in duties.

    Karl Marx said, "Destroy their culture, rewrite their history. Ruin their art and literature, and defame their heroes, by offering fabrications to scandalize that which they considered good.
    After reading this Obama said I am on it.

  3. #3
    Senior Member


    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Location
    Central KY
    Posts
    2,563
    If you plan on paying off the government's ability to tax you, you would be better off just giving them what there taxing you on because you don't own it, your renting from the government or get ready to fight the government.
    Denton likes this.

  4. Remove Advertisements
    PrepperForums.net
    Advertisements
     

  5. #4
    Senior Member


    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    Cave Creek, Arizona
    Posts
    2,123
    Some states allow you to take property that is worth say $100,000 which would be taxed at 2% for $2000 and put a 99 year hold on it for development. Basically you make it a game preserve or nature preserve. You still get to use it for all of the reasons you do today with the only exception is that you can't improve on the land. No new buildings. No farming, no adding ponds - the land stays in the current status. BUT! Because of this 99 year wilderness lien or what ever they call it, your $100,000 land is now worth $10,000 and at 2% is $200 annually.

    So, some people buy 100 acres of land. Section off 2 to 5 acres for a house and leave 95 acres wild. They put in all of the barns, trails, roads, fences, structures, ponds etc that they think they will need, and then after they are done, they file the 99 year lien freezing development on the land. that gives them 5 acres they can continue to develop and improve and keep at the higher value and then 95 acres that they can completely de-value for tax purposes.

    The catch is that if you sell that land the 99 year wilderness lien stays in place. So new owners can not develop either. That will harm your property value. If you paid $100,000 for the land, and now the lien makes it worth $10,000 you will have lost 90% of your property value. For that reason you have to own the land outright before this is done.
    KG7NDC

    The only thing that separates man from animal is our affinity for toilet paper.
    Once we as a society lose that affinity we begin to descend back into the animal kingdom, and after three or more days you will find the food chain beginning to invert on itself.

  6. #5
    Senior Member


    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Posts
    4,373
    Well I disagree. The government doesn't hold title to it. If you have the taxes they demand paid each year and don't have to worry about that happening it would take a far more anarchist like move on their part to take the land. That is where plan "b" comes in and is just fine.


    Quote Originally Posted by ekim View Post
    If you plan on paying off the government's ability to tax you, you would be better off just giving them what there taxing you on because you don't own it, your renting from the government or get ready to fight the government.

  7. #6
    Senior Member


    Join Date
    May 2013
    Posts
    559
    Quote Originally Posted by Ripon View Post
    Well I disagree. The government doesn't hold title to it. If you have the taxes they demand paid each year and don't have to worry about that happening it would take a far more anarchist like move on their part to take the land. That is where plan "b" comes in and is just fine.
    You're both right. You are renting it from the king, but you aren't better off just giving it to them...

    Ripon, I really like your OP, it is a great idea, but in part Ekim is right - property tax is the most insidious tax ever envisioned and should be abolished or at least taken so that a main house and a 160acre plot are tax free!!! IMHO only commercial/rental property should ever be taxed and even then I DO NOT like the idea of property taxes...

  8. #7
    Senior Member


    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Location
    Central KY
    Posts
    2,563
    Does the federal government pay the citizens for the federal land they lay claim to all over the country, NO. And the tax payers have to pay to use it if they are even allowed to. The federal and state governments are completely out of control and need to be brought under control by any means necessary by the legal citizens of this country. King George had nothing on our current governments that the current government hasn't gone way overboard on! You can't/don't buy freedoms through taxes.

    As far as property taxes, at worst it should be a one time tax on property and that is a stretch, IMO.

  9. #8
    Senior Member


    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Location
    Central KY
    Posts
    2,563
    Quote Originally Posted by VenerableSage View Post
    Aside from my belief that the taxes are WAAYYY TO LOW for landowners. I don't even see how you only pay 1500 when the land is probably worth millions. Anyways I believe that the government should own all land and just lease it out to people that want to have land. Instead of massing up land and money and sucking up all the money from the poor the government would own all land and would farm the land themselves and make money from the land as they see fit. They would be much more efficient because they are a larger collective and wouldn't discriminate.
    OMG, another one, better put on your flameproof suit, you might need it. Can you say liberal fool......

  10. #9
    Senior Member


    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Location
    Missouri Breaks of Montana
    Posts
    1,508
    Quote Originally Posted by VenerableSage View Post
    Aside from my belief that the taxes are WAAYYY TO LOW for landowners. I don't even see how you only pay 1500 when the land is probably worth millions. Anyways I believe that the government should own all land and just lease it out to people that want to have land. Instead of massing up land and money and sucking up all the money from the poor the government would own all land and would farm the land themselves and make money from the land as they see fit. They would be much more efficient because they are a larger collective and wouldn't discriminate.

    You again!!!! Would you like to come hunting in Montana?? You are more than welcome!! I would be happy to take you out!
    LaPrepAR likes this.
    Check out my blog Hidden Content Also SurvivingTheBreaks on Facebook.. My radio show will be goin live next week on Hidden Content so be sure to listen out.

  11. #10
    Senior Member


    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Posts
    1,353
    Quote Originally Posted by Smitty901 View Post
    SHTF none of our preplanned finances will madder. You will keep or give up what is yours based other preps you have made.They do not need to use taxes to take your land by law they can just take it. Supreme Court already ruled on that one. What they pay is what they want they decide what fair value is.
    We lost 2 acres to high 16 that way. We were not even paid what the land was valued at for taxes.
    A guy down the road from me lost his house to eminent domain. He had acres of orange grove. The city came, said he wasn't maintaining the land, took it and built a public park/community park.

    Thing was, his grove was a helluva lot nicer than the other ones around.

    I'm just about current in my property taxes. It was due on the 10th. It'll be paid first of the month next month.

    They are NOT taking my land. If they want my land, they can collect my guns at that time too. Except the guns will be one bullet at a time

 

 
Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast

Sponsored Links

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Similar Threads

  1. Senate Democrats Lose Key Republican Support on Gun Background Checks
    By Verteidiger in forum HandGuns, Pistols and Revolvers, Long Rifles, Shotguns, SKS, AK, AR
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 03-08-2013, 08:55 AM
  2. Niners lose XLVII
    By yzingerr in forum General Talk
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 02-04-2013, 10:48 PM
  3. Are you prepared to lose loved one's should the world as we know it end?
    By Fuzzee in forum General Prepper and Survival Talk
    Replies: 19
    Last Post: 12-06-2012, 08:19 PM
  4. Land Sailing and Land Yachts / Recharable Golf Cart / Sailboat
    By survival in forum Strictly Bug Out Vehicles
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 06-29-2012, 11:31 PM
Back to Top